Cite as: Cold Spring Harb. Protoc.; 2009; doi:10.1101/pdb.ip66

This Protocol
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Discuss this protocolDiscussion icon
Right arrow Alert me when this protocol is cited
Right arrow Alert me when comments are published
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar protocols in this database
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new releases of protocols
Right arrow Save to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roux, K. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roux, K. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Biology, general
Right arrow Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
Right arrow Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), general
Right arrow Amplification of DNA by PCR
Right arrow Cloning By PCR
Right arrow Purification for PCR
Right arrowRelated Articles
Right arrowRelated Protocols
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

information_panelInformation Panel

Optimization and Troubleshooting in PCR

Kenneth H. Roux

Adapted from PCR Primer: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd edition (eds. Dieffenbach and Dveksler). CSHL Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 2003.


INTRODUCTION

The use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to generate large amounts of a desired product can be a double-edged sword. Failure to amplify under optimum conditions can lead to the generation of multiple undefined and unwanted products, even to the exclusion of the desired product. At the other extreme, no product may be produced. A typical response at this point is to vary one or more of the many parameters that are known to contribute to primer-template fidelity and primer extension. High on the list of optimization variables are Mg++ concentrations, buffer pH, and cycling conditions. With regard to the last, the annealing temperature is most important. The situation is further complicated by the fact that some of the variables are quite interdependent. For example, because dNTPs directly chelate a proportional number of Mg++ ions, an increase in the concentration of dNTPs decreases the concentration of free Mg++ available to influence polymerase function. This article discusses various optimization strategies, including touchdown PCR and hot-start PCR.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Articles

PCR Primer Design
Arun Apte and Saurabha Daniel
Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2009: 65. [Abstract] [Full Text]

Strategies for Overcoming PCR Inhibition
Peter Rådström, Charlotta Löfström, Maria Lövenklev, Rickard Knutsson, and Petra Wolffs
Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2008: 20. [Abstract] [Full Text]

Related Protocols

PCR Amplification of Highly GC-Rich Regions
Lise Lotte Hansen and Just Justesen
Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2006: 4093. [Extract] [Full Text]

Long and Accurate PCR
Wayne M. Barnes
Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2006: 4094. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cold Spring Harb ProtocHome page
C.-C. Lan, R. Tang, I. Un San Leong, and D. R. Love
Quantitative Real-Time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) of Zebrafish Transcripts: Optimization of RNA Extraction, Quality Control Considerations, and Data Analysis
Cold Spring Harb Protoc, October 1, 2009; 2009(10): 10.1101/pdb.prot5314.
[Abstract] [Full Text]