Cite as: Cold Spring Harb. Protoc.; 2009; doi:10.1101/pdb.prot5200

This Protocol
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Update/discuss this protocolDiscussion icon
Right arrow Alert me when this protocol is cited
Right arrow Alert me when comments are published
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar protocols in this database
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new releases of protocols
Right arrow Save to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goodsell, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goodsell, D. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Protein: Protein Interactions
Right arrow Protein: Protein Interactions, general
Right arrow Genome-wide and Computer-based Analysis
Right arrow Protein Identification and Analysis
Right arrow Computational Biology
Right arrow Proteins and Proteomics, general
Right arrow Proteomics
Right arrow Protein Classification and Structure Prediction
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

protocolProtocol

Computational Docking of Biomolecular Complexes with AutoDock

David S. Goodsell

Adapted from Protein-Protein Interactions (eds. Golemis and Adams). CSHL Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 2005.


INTRODUCTION

Computer prediction of the interaction between enzymes and small molecules has now advanced to the point that it allows accurate prediction of bound conformations and binding constants. For instance, the program AutoDock allows consistent computational docking of flexible ligands with about a dozen torsional degrees of freedom, and the empirical free-energy force field provides predicted energies that are accurate to within ~2 kcal/mol, or an ~30-fold difference in binding constants. Thus, these methods can easily separate compounds with micromolar and nanomolar binding constants from those with millimolar binding constants, and can often rank molecules with finer differences in affinity. Computational docking methods can be used to screen a variety of possible compounds, searching for new compounds with specific binding properties or testing a range of modifications of an existing compound. The approach has been successful in numerous cases, most notably, the discovery of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors. This protocol presents a detailed outline and advice for use of AutoDock and its graphical interface, AutoDock Tools, to analyze biomolecular complexes using computational docking. The first step is to prepare the coordinate files for the docking molecule and the target molecule. The second step is the calculation of the affinity grid for the target molecule. In the third step, the docking molecule is docked with the affinity grid, and, finally, the results are analyzed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?