Cite as: Cold Spring Harb. Protoc.; 2007; doi:10.1101/pdb.prot4915
| Protocol |
Childrens Medical Research Institute, University of Sydney, Wentworthville, New South Wales 2145, Australia
1Corresponding author (ptam{at}cmri.usyd.edu.au)
INTRODUCTION
The allocation of different progenitor populations to embryonic structures can be visualized by tracking the distribution of cells to specific tissues in the live embryo. A critical prerequisite for cell tracking is to identify unambiguously the progenitors and their descendants during morphogenesis. This can be achieved by using molecular markers that are expressed from transgenes integrated into the genome or as episomal DNA constructs, or by tagging the cells with exogenous markers that are incorporated into the cell membrane or cytoplasmic components of the cells. These labels can be introduced by dye-labeling the membrane, injecting marker enzyme into the cytoplasm, or integrating reporter constructs by transfection or electroporation. This protocol describes how to label cells in the endoderm (which, at this stage of development, is the superficial tissue layer) of live mouse embryos at 7.0-7.5 days post-coitum (dpc), using two carbocyanine dyes (DiI and DiO).
RELATED INFORMATION
As tools for tracking cell movement, fluorescent lipophilic dyes are ideal short-term, user-friendly cell markers. The carbocyanine tracers DiI (1,1'-dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate, which emits a red fluorescence) and the analogous DiO (3,3'-dioctadecyloxacarbocyanine perchlorate, which emits a green fluorescence) are vital markers, i.e., they can be used on living cells. DiI is the most commonly used dye in fate-mapping studies because it retains fluorescence after fixation and wax embedding. DiI has been used in conjunction with carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CSFE) to intensify the fluorescent signal in living embryos, though in most cases this may be unnecessary. DiO, on the other hand, does not retain fluorescence following fixation or embedding.
These dyes can be applied focally to a small group of 10-15 cells (the number varies with the size of the apical surface of the cells if labeling is performed on cells in an epithelium), and broadly to cells over a large area of the embryo where many or all of the cells are labeled. Following labeling, cells and their descendants are traced to reveal the pattern of their displacement in the intact embryo, which is cultured in vitro. Details of the techniques for culturing whole post-implantation mouse embryos can be found in Sturm and Tam (1993) and in Roller Culture of Post-implantation Embryos.
The technique outlined in this article has been used for mapping the movement of the definitive endoderm during gastrulation and morphogenesis of the embryonic gut (Tam et al. 2004, 2007). The technique can also be used for marking the endoderm of more advanced embryos at early organogenesis (Tremblay and Zaret 2005), and for germ layers located deeper in the embryo, such as the ectoderm and mesoderm, as long as they can be accessed by micromanipulation instruments for the delivery of the dye.
MATERIALS
Reagents
Embryos stage 7.0-7.5 dpc, collected from mice housed in a reversed-light-cycle room
By using a reversed-light schedule (i.e., dark period from 6 am to 6 pm), the timing of mating can be shifted by about half a day so that the labeling experiment can be performed on 7.0-dpc embryos at normal working hours.
Paraffin oil, heavy (BDH)
Unlike light paraffin oil, this does not need cleaning.
Dissection and labeling of mouse embryos is performed in PB1 medium.
Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)
Rat serum, 100%
Prepare according to Preparation of Rat Serum. To optimize the embryotrophic properties of the rat serum, following exsanguination, promptly separate the serum from the blood cells before clotting occurs.
Equipment
Bunsen burner
Capillaries, thick-walled glass (outer diameter: 1.0 mm, inner diameter: ~0.60 mm; Leica Microsystems, 520-119)
Capillaries, thin-walled glass (outer diameter: 1.0 mm, inner diameter: 0.75 mm; Drummond, 900 021 61)
Chamber slides, four-well (Nalgene Nunc International)
Culture bottles, glass, thin-walled (15-mL capacity)
Digital camera, SPOT advanced (version 3.5.9.1)
Diamond cutter
Fluorescence stereomicroscope (Leica MZ FLIII) with GFP3 (425/60 nm) filter set for DiO (excitation 470/40 nm,), and G filter set (546/10 nm) for DiI
Forceps, fine and standard (Fine Science Tools or Aesculap)
Gas mixture (5% CO2, 5% O2, 90% N2)
Gas mixture (5% CO2, 20% O2, 75% N2; optional, see Step 23)
Gas regulator
Supplies and maintains a continuously replenished gas phase in the rotating culture bottle.
Incubator, water-jacketed (37ºC, 5% CO2 in air; Forma Scientific)
Microforge (Narishige Scientific Instrument Laboratory)
Micromanipulation apparatus (Leica Microsystems)
Micrometer, ocular
Needles, alloy metal (or glass)
These needles are made by electrolytically sharpening orthodontic wire (Rocky Mountain Orthodontics) using a wire-polishing unit (Dental Corporation of America).
Petri dishes (60 mm)
Photo manipulation software
Pipette puller, horizontal type (e.g., model P-97, Sutter Instruments)
Pipette puller, vertical type (e.g., Kopf model 720; optional, see Step 1.ii)
Pipettes, Pasteur (9 in)
Roller culture apparatus (e.g., BTC Engineering)
Scissors, iridectomy (Fine Science Tools)
Scissors, standard (Aesculap)
Syringe injector, micrometer (IM-5A/5B; Narishige)
This is an oil-filled system used to apply suction and expulsion action to the embryo-holding pipette.
Syringe injector, de Fonbrune (Alcatel)
The de Fonbrune injector is an oil-filled system used to apply suction and expulsion actions to the labeling pipette.
METHOD
Setting Up the Experiment
![]() View larger version (69K): [in a new window] |
Figure 1. Labeling pipette. Two bends are generated in both the holding and the labeling pipette to ensure that the pipette can reach over the lip of the Petri dish to access the embryo. Using a small flame, the first bend (asterisk) is introduced 1-2 cm from the tip. Turn the pipette (tip pointing upward) and generate the second bend (arrow) 1-2 cm from the first bend. The angle of each bend is ~90°-100°. |
![]() View larger version (122K): [in a new window] |
Figure 2. Micromanipulation setup. (1) Wild M3Z (Leica) dissecting microscope. (2) Oil-pump syringe (DeFonbrune) for operating labeling pipette. (3) Microinjector (Nashirige) oil-filled micrometer syringe for operating the holding pipette. (4) Instrument holder for holding pipette. (5) Instrument holder for labeling pipette. (6) Instrument sleeve for labeling pipette. (7) Joystick for fine positioning of the instrument holder in the horizontal plane. (8) Coarse adjustment knobs for positioning the right micromanipulator. |
![]() View larger version (84K): [in a new window] |
Figure 3. (A) The operating medium drop/PB1 for labeling. The embryo is kept stationary with the holding pipette (1). With the holding pipette the embryo is moved to the edge of the PB1 such that the labeling site is nearest to the medium-oil interface. The labeling pipette (2) is loaded with dye and kept in the oil phase near the medium drop. The labeling pipette and site of labeling is aligned to ensure they are in same focal plane. (B) Move the labeling pipette slowly into the medium drop to ensure that the dye is not leaking from the pipette. (C) When the labeling pipette touches the site of labeling on the embryo carefully expel the dye in the labeling pipette. When an adequate amount of dye has been released onto the embryos, stop further painting by lowering the oil pressure in the labeling pipette and quickly remove the pipette from the medium drop. (D) Successive labeling using double-instrument holder. (1) 7.5-dpc embryo to be labeled. (2) Holding pipette. (3) and (4) Separate droplets of DiI and DiO. (5) Two labeling pipettes filled with either DiI or DiO and mounted on a double-instrument holder which allows for successive deployment of the two pipettes for labeling. |
Labeling the Embryos with a Single Dye
Double-Labeling the Embryos
Embryos can be labeled with two dyes either sequentially (Step 18) or simultaneously (Step 19).
Imaging and Culturing Embryos
![]() View larger version (116K): [in a new window] |
Figure 4. Rotating bottle culture apparatus. The rotator is housed in a thick persplex temperature-controlled chamber. Gas is fed through (1) a porous particle filter, (2) a humidifier, and (3) an overflow trap to an inlet that goes to the inner chamber of (4) the rotating drum to which (5) culture bottles with medium containing the embryos are attached. |
Analyzing the Labeled Embryos
At 24 and/or 48 h after culture, analyze the embryos by photographing the distribution of labeled cells under a fluorescence stereomicroscope with the appropriate filter sets for DiO and DiI.
TROUBLESHOOTING
Problem: Lack of fluorescent cells in labeled embryo.
[Step 5]
Solution: Consider the following:
Problem: Fluorescence observed in the mesoderm of the embryo.
[Step 5]
Solution: Consider the following:
Problem: Abnormal development of an embryo.
[Step 6]
Solution: Consider the following:
DISCUSSION
Dye-labeling is a technique that has been used extensively to study morphogenetic processes associated with cell and tissue movement. This technique has been used in zebrafish (Mangrum et al. 2002), Xenopus (Chalmers and Slack 2000), chick (Hatada and Stern 1994), and mouse (Tam et al. 2007) to track the allocation of the germ layers, the migration of cell populations such as neural crest cells (Collazo et al. 1993; Trainor et al. 1994), and the development of neuronal projections within the nervous system (Baker and Reese 1993).
In mutant embryos, dye-labeling is used to track movement and tissue contribution of the mutant cells thereby revealing the effect of particular mutations and pinpointing the cell population most affected (Tam et al. 2007). Fluorescent dyes are available in a variety of colors, which permits multiple labeling of different cell populations so that their movement relative to each other can be analyzed.
Dye-labeling allows control over the amount of dye delivered and the size of the area to be labeled. Blanket labeling gives a global view of the movement of a cell population, while more focal labels can reveal movement of individual groups of cells (Fig. 5 ). In contrast to cell grafting (see Fate-Mapping Technique: Grafting Fluorescent Cells into Gastrula-Stage Mouse Embryos at 7-7.5 Days Post-coitum) (Franklin et al. 2007) or electroporation of a reporter construct (see Fate-Mapping Technique: Targeted Whole-Embryo Electroporation of DNA Constructs into the Germ Layers of Mouse Embryos 7-7.5 Days Post-coitum) (Khoo et al. 2007), dye-labeling requires the least preparation of the labeling reagent or transgenic resources and allows an instantaneous evaluation of incorporation of the dyes by fluorescence microscopy at the beginning of the experiment. One disadvantage of dye-labeling is the dilution of the cell marker with every cell division. The longevity of the cell marker may become a significant problem when embryos are cultured for more than 48 h.
![]() View larger version (89K): [in a new window] |
Figure 5. Focal and blanket double labeling of 7.0-dpc embryos. (A) 7.0-dpc embryo labeled focally with DiI at the anterior part of the primitive streak (APS, circle) and with DiO at the posterior part of the primitive streak. (B) Twenty-four hours later, labeled cells are distributed along the midline, with DiI-labeled cells allocated at the anterior part of the embryo, which will make up the future head region. DiO-labeled cells are predominantly found in the midgut and hindgut region of the 8.0-dpc embryo. (C) 7.0-dpc embryo labeled broadly with DiI and DiO resulting in separate and overlapping regions of labeling. (D) Twenty-four hours later, cells are distributed along the midline with DiO-labeled cells originating from the APS localized in the head region, whereas the DiI-labeled cells are found in the posterior part of the foregut and extensively in the midgut and hindgut regions.
|
This protocol can also be used for labeling endoderm of 8.0-dpc embryos. This technique is also generally applicable for labeling all germ layer derivatives provided that the tissues are accessible for micromanipulation.
REFERENCES
Baker, G.E. and Reese, B.E. 1993. Using confocal laser scanning microscopy to investigate the organization and development of neuronal projections labeled with DiI. Methods Cell Biol. 38: 325–344.[Medline]
Chalmers, A.D. and Slack, J.M. 2000. The Xenopus tadpole gut: Fate maps and morphogenetic movements. Development 127: 381–392.[Abstract]
Collazo, A., Bronner-Fraser, M., and Fraser, S.E. 1993. Vital dye labeling of Xenopus laevis trunk neural crest reveals multipotency and novel pathways of migration. Development 118: 363–376.[Abstract]
Franklin, V.J., Bildsoe, H., and Tam, P.L. 2007. Fate-mapping technique: Grafting fluorescent cells into gastrula-stage mouse embryos at 7-7.5 days post-coitum. CSH Protocols doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot4892.
Hatada, Y. and Stern, C.D. 1994. A fate map of the epiblast of the early chick embryo. Development 120: 2879–2889.[Abstract]
Khoo, P.-L., Franklin, V.J., and Tam, P.L. 2007. Fate-mapping technique: Targeted whole-embryo electroporation of DNA constructs into the germ layers of mouse embryos 7-7.5 days post-coitum. CSH Protocols doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot4893.
Mangrum, W.I., Dowling, J.E., and Cohen, E.D. 2002. A morphological classification of ganglion cells in the zebrafish retina. Vis. Neurosci. 19: 767–779.[Medline]
Sturm, K. and Tam, P.P.L. 1993. Isolation and culture of whole post-implantation embryos and germ layer derivatives. Methods Enzymol. 225: 164–190.[Medline]
Tam, P.P., Khoo, P.L., Wong, N., Tsang, T.E., and Behringer, R.R. 2004. Regionalization of cell fates and cell movement in the endoderm of the mouse gastrula and the impact of loss of Lhx1 (Lim1) function. Dev. Biol. 274: 171–187.[Medline]
Tam, P.P., Khoo, P.L., Lewis, S.L., Bildsoe, H., Wong, N., Tsang, T.E., Gad, J.M., and Robb, L. 2007. Sequential allocation and global pattern of movement of the definitive endoderm in the mouse embryo during gastrulation. Development 134: 251–260.
Trainor, P.A., Tan, S.S., and Tam, P.P. 1994. Cranial paraxial mesoderm: Regionalisation of cell fate and impact on craniofacial development in mouse embryos. Development 120: 2397–2408.
Tremblay, K.D. and Zaret, K.S. 2005. Distinct populations of endoderm cells converge to generate the embryonic liver bud and ventral foregut tissues. Dev. Biol. 280: 87–99.[Medline]
Related Protocols
Copyright © 2007 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Online ISSN: 1559-6095 Terms of Service |