Cite as: Cold Spring Harb. Protoc.; 2008; doi:10.1101/pdb.prot4974

This Protocol
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Update/discuss this protocolDiscussion icon
Right arrow Alert me when this protocol is cited
Right arrow Alert me when comments are published
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar protocols in this database
Right arrow Alert me to new releases of protocols
Right arrow Save to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Estécio, M. R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Issa, J.-P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Estécio, M. R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Issa, J.-P. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Bioinformatics/Genomics, general
Right arrow High-Throughput Analysis, general
Right arrow Fluorescence
Right arrow Fluorescence, general
Right arrow Molecular Biology, general
Right arrow DNA Modification/Epigenetics
Right arrow Genomic DNA
Right arrow Genome Analysis
Right arrow Microarrays
Right arrow Microarrays, general
Right arrow Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
Right arrow Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), general
Right arrow Amplification of DNA by PCR
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Legend icon

protocolProtocol

Methylated CpG Island Amplification and Microarray (MCAM) for High-Throughput Analysis of DNA Methylation

Marcos R. H. Estécio1,3, Pearlly S. Yan2, Tim H-M. Huang2, and Jean-Pierre J. Issa1

1 Department of Leukemia, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
2 Human Cancer Genetics Program, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA

3Corresponding author (mestecio{at}mdanderson.org)


INTRODUCTION

This protocol describes the use of methylated CpG island amplification (MCA) in combination with a microarray platform to analyze genome-wide DNA methylation in a high-throughput fashion. In this approach, termed MCAM, methylated CpG islands are selectively targeted using oligonucleotide adaptors after two rounds of digestion with a combination of methylation-sensitive and methylation-insensitive nucleases. They are then amplified using PCR. The resulting amplicons, representing the methylated fraction of the genome, are labeled with fluorochromes. Subsequently, a comparative hybridization of reference and test samples (typically normal and tumor DNA specimens) is done on a microarray platform.


RELATED INFORMATION

This protocol has been tested in cancer cell lines and primary tumors (Estécio et al. 2007). Validation experiments by bisulfite-PCR (considered to be the gold standard) of fifteen genes in three cancer lines and eleven primary colorectal carcinomas revealed sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 96%, respectively. Additionally, MCAM could detect methylation differences of as little as 10% between tumor and normal adjacent paired colon samples.


MATERIALS

Reagents

Agarose gel (1.5%)

Cot-1DNA (human; Invitrogen)

Cy3-dCTP and Cy5-dCTP (GE Healthcare)

caution DMSO (see note at Step 10)

dNTP mix (25 mM)

Ethanol (prechilled to 4°C for Step 23)

Genomic DNA

Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I

The best source for this exonuclease at 40 units/µL is the Bioprime DNA Labeling System (Invitrogen).

recipe LowC dNTP mix (10X)

recipe MCA reaction buffer (10X)

recipe MCAM wash solution 1

MCAM wash solution 2

recipeSSC (20X) is diluted 100-fold in H2O to prepare this wash solution, which is 0.2X SSC.

Oligonucleotide primers:

We have developed two different sets of primers (RMCA and RXMA) that differ in CG content and represent slightly different subsets of CpG islands. On average, the RMCA primers amplify smaller and more CG rich fragments than RXMA. Some probes work well using either condition, but others work better (or exclusively) using only one of the sets of primers. In our experience, the use of either set of primers for MCAM resulted in similar sensitivity and specificity. For this reason, one set of primers per experiment can be successfully used to reveal global patterns of methylation.

Octomers (random, 8N)

RMCA Primers (RMCA24 : 5'-CCACCGCCATCCGAGCCTTTCTGC-3'; RMCA12 : 5'-CCGGGCAGAAAG-3')

RXMA Primers (RXMA24 : 5'-AGCACTCTCCAGCCTCTCACCGAC-3'; RXMA12 : 5'-CCGGGTCGGTGA-3')

PCR Purification kit (QIAquick kit; Qiagen)

caution Phenol:chloroform (1.5:1 [v/v]; pH 9.0)

recipe Prehybridization solution for MCAM

recipe React2 buffer (10X)

Restriction enzymes: SmaI and XmaI

SDS hybridization solution (2X; Genisphere)

Sodium acetate (3 M)

T4 DNA ligase and 10X ligase buffer

Taq DNA polymerase

recipe TE buffer (pH 8.0)

Equipment

Beaker (large)

Centrifugal filter unit (e.g., Microcon YM-30; Millipore)

Centrifuge (benchtop)

Coverslips

Dishes (slide staining)

Electrophoresis equipment for 1.5% agarose gel

Hot plate

Hybridization chamber (e.g., HybChamber Mica, Genomic Solutions)

Ice

Incubator preset to 42°C

Microarray slides

Microcentrifuge

PCR equipment

Rack (for slides)

Rocker platform

Scanner and software (e.g., Genepix 4000B scanner and GenepixPro 6.0 software; Axon Instruments)

Spectrophotometer

Tubes (1.7-mL microcentrifuge)

Vortexer

Water bath preset to 60°C

Water baths or heat blocks preset to 16°C, 25°C, 37°C, 65°C, 95°C, and 100°C


METHOD

Figure 1 presents an overview of the MCAM method.

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the MCAM method. Enrichment for methylated DNA and reduction of genome complexity is achieved by serial digestion with SmaI (methylation sensitive) and XmaI (methylation sensitive) restriction enzymes, followed by ligation of adaptors and PCR amplification. The resulting amplicons, representative of the methylated fraction of tumor and normal cells, are labeled and cohybridized in a microarray platform. Image acquisition and data analysis allow identification of methylated and nonmethylated genes by comparing intensity values of Cy5 and Cy3 dyes for each pair of tumor and control samples.

Preparation of MCA Amplicons

This method was adapted from an original protocol by Toyota et al. (1999). An online version is also available at http://www.mdanderson.org/departments/methylation/.

1. Digest 5 µg of genomic DNA using 100 units of SmaI for 16 h at 25°C.

2. Add 20 units of XmaI and incubate the reaction for 6 h at 37°C.

3. Bring the reaction volume to 500 µL with H2O and add one volume of 1.5:1 phenol:chloroform (pH 9.0). Vortex the mixture for 1 min, centrifuge for 10 min at 13,000 rpm, and transfer the supernatant to a 1.7-mL microcentrifuge tube.

4. Precipitate the DNA by adding 1/10th volume of 3 M sodium acetate and two volumes of 100% ethanol.

5. Incubate the sample at –70°C for 1 h, and centrifuge for 30 min at 13,000 rpm. Pour out the ethanol and air dry the DNA pellet.

6. Resuspend the DNA in 20 µL of TE and determine the DNA concentration using a spectrophotometer.

7. Prepare the adaptor mixture as follows:
i. Dilute the RXMA (or RMCA) primers to 100 µM.

ii. Combine 50 µL of RXMA24 with 50 µL of RXMA12 (or RMCA24 and RMCA12).
8. Incubate the adaptor mix for 3 min at 65°C, and cool it to room temperature over 60 min.
This mixture can be stored for up to 6 mo at -20°C.

9. Ligate the adaptors to the digested DNA as follows:
i. Combine the following reagents:
500 ng Digested DNA (Step 6)
10 µL Adaptor mixture (Step 8)
3 µL 10X ligase buffer
400 units T4 DNA ligase
to 30 µL H2O

ii. Incubate the ligation reaction for 16 h at 16°C.
10. Prepare the MCA reactions using the following reagents:
10 µL 10X MCA reaction buffer
100 pmol RXMA24 (or RMCA24) primer
15 units Taq DNA polymerase
1.2 µL dNTP mix (25 mM)
5 µL DMSO (RMCA primers only)
3 µL Ligation mixture (Step 9.ii)
to 97 µL H2O

DMSO is not needed with RXMA primers.
Typically, four MCA reactions per tested sample are necessary to generate enough PCR product for labeling.

11. Incubate the reaction for 5 min at 72°C, and perform PCR as follows:
Number of cycles Temperature Time

20 95°C 1 min
72°C (for RXMA) or 77°C (for RMCA) 3 min
1 72°C (for RXMA) or 77°C (for RMCA) 10 min

12. Analyze 10 µL of the PCR products on a 1.5% agarose gel to check the quality of the amplification.
A relatively strong smear, ranging from 300 bp to 2 kb, should be visible for RXMA primers. Expect a smear ranging from 200 bp to 1 kb when using RMCA primers.

Labeling Amplicons and Slide Hybridization

This hybridization protocol is optimized for the Human CpG-island 12K Array (HCGI12K) from University Health Network (www.microarrays.ca).

13. Combine PCR products of replicate samples and purify them using the QIAquick PCR Purification kit according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. Elute the samples in 30 µL of 1X TE buffer.

14. Quantify the DNA yield using a spectrophotometer.

15. Label the PCR products.
i. Assemble each labeling reaction as follows (35-µL total volume):
25 µL (5 µg) MCA product (Step 11) in H2O
10 µL (7.5 µg/µL) Random octomer primer (8N)

ii. Denature the nucleic acids by incubating at 100°C for 5 min, and then immediately transfer the tubes to ice.

iii. Add the following reagents to the nucleic acids (to a 50-µL total volume):
5 µL 10X React2 buffer
5 µL 10X LowC dNTP mix
3 µL Cy3-dCTP (or Cy5-dCTP)
2 µL Klenow fragment (stock 40 units/µL)

Typically, Cy5-dCTP mix is used for tumor DNA and Cy3-dCTP is used for normal (reference) DNA.

iv. Incubate the reactions for 2 h at 37°C.
16. Increase the reaction volume to 100 µL with H2O, and purify each sample using a PCR purification kit (QIAquick) as follows:
i. Add 500 µL of PBI buffer to the column in the PCR purification kit, let it stand for 5 min, centrifuge the column for 1 min at 13,000 rpm, and discard the flow-through.

ii. Wash the column with 700 µL of PE buffer, centrifuge for 1 min at 13,000 rpm, discard the flow-through, and centrifuge once again at 13,000 rpm for 1 min.

iii. Place the column in a clean 1.7-mL microcentrifuge tube, and elute twice with 50 µL of H2O, waiting 2 min between centrifugations.
17. Read the samples in a spectrophotometer at the following wavelengths (use the full volume of labeled sample): Cy3= 550 nm; Cy5= 650 nm.

18. Calculate the concentration of incorporated dyes as follows:
Cy3 = A550/0.15 = pmol/µL of Cy3 dye incorporated

Cy5 = A650/0.25 = pmol/µL of Cy5 dye incorporated
Optimal amounts for hybridization are between 250 pmol (minimum) and 400 pmol (maximum) of incorporated dyes.
19. Prehybridize the slides for 45 min at 42°C in prehybridization solution for MCAM.

20. Combine equal picomole amounts of labeled tumor and normal amplicons and bring to 500 µL with H2O. Reduce the volume to a 15-µL concentrate using a centrifugal filter unit (Microcon YM-30) as follows:
i. Centrifuge the column for 12 min at 14,000g.

ii. Invert the column in a new microcentrifuge tube and centrifuge it for 3 min at 5000 rpm to collect the sample.

iii. Transfer the sample to a new microcentrifuge tube and bring the volume to 15 µL with H2O, if necessary.
This step typically takes 12 min at 14,000g.
21. Heat a large beaker of H2O to boiling on a hot plate.

22. Rinse microarray slides in room temperature H2O.

23. Place the slides in boiling H2O for 1 min and in 4°C ethanol for another 1 min.

24. Immediately centrifuge the microarrays for 6 min at 600 rpm in a benchtop centrifuge.

25. Add 10 µL of human Cot1 DNA (total 10 µg) and 25 µL of 2X SDS hybridization solution to the sample from Step 20. Mix gently.

26. Denature the DNA (from Step 25) for 2 min at 95°C, and hold the tubes in a 60°C water bath.

27. Place the microarray slides in a hybridization chamber. Add 50 µL of MCAM wash solution 2 underneath each side of the slide.

28. Transfer the labeled DNA onto the array area and place a coverslip over the array.

29. Close the hybridization chamber tightly and incubate it in the dark for 16 h in a 60°C water bath.
The hybridization chamber should be submerged in water, but direct contact with the bottom of the water bath should be avoided.

30. Warm two 500-mL bottles of MCAM wash solution 1 and 1 500-mL bottle of MCAM wash solution 2 to 60°C.

31. Place the slides, with coverslips facing down, in a slide-staining dish containing MCAM wash solution 1 at 60°C. Keep the slides at a 45° angle to the bottom of the dish to allow the coverslips to detach from the microarrays.

32. Place a slide rack in a slide-staining dish filled with prewarmed MCAM wash solution 1. Transfer the slides into the dish and place it on a rocker platform set to 100 rpm for 10 min.

33. Transfer the slides to a new dish filled with prewarmed MCAM wash solution 2 and place it on a rocker platform set to 100 rpm for 10 min.

34. Rinse the slides by submerging the slide rack 10-20 times in H2O.

35. Immediately centrifuge the slides for 6 min at 600 rpm in a benchtop centrifuge.

36. Scan the slides.


DISCUSSION

The MCAM protocol was optimized using an array containing 12,192 CpG-island clones from the Sanger Institute (Cross et al. 1994; Heisler et al. 2005). However, this method can be applied to other array platforms, such as oligo, tiling, and custom-made arrays with larger gene representation. Our method compares favorably to other published methylation microarray protocols because it provides reproducible results with a high validation rate and demonstrated use in clinical samples for clustering cases into distinct molecular groups. In our experience, the sensitivity of methods to isolate DNA using 5-mC antibodies and methyl binding domain proteins is low, which limits their application in genome-wide studies (Weber et al. 2005; Rauch et al. 2006). The use of methylation-sensitive enzymes with frequent cutting sites, for example, HpaII/MspI (Hatada et al. 2006), results in a high genome fraction for amplification. In such highly complex circumstances, PCR efficiency is compromised and likely favors amplification of non-CpG island DNA. In comparison, our MCAM technique simultaneously reduces complexity and increases specificity by targeting methylated CpG islands before amplification.

A limitation of our method is that the generation of MCA amplicons depends on the presence of two SmaI sites in relatively close proximity (no more than 1-2 kb apart), which occurs in around 80% of the promoter CpG islands, as calculated from in silico digestion of the human genome. Also, differences in CG content make certain sequences more difficult to amplify in MCA and decrease hybridization efficiency, which may explain the presence of false-positive and false-negative data in MCAM. Despite these limitations, the low rate of false-positive data makes MCAM valuable in large-scale investigations.


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health grants P50CA100632, RO1CA098006, and R33CA89837.


REFERENCES

Cross, S.H., Charlton, J.A., Nan, X., and Bird, A.P. 1994. Purification of CpG islands using a methylated DNA binding column. Nat Genet. 6: 236–244.[Medline]

Estécio, M.R., Yan, P.S., Ibrahim, A.E., Tellez, C.S., Shen, L., Huang, T.H., and Issa, J.P. 2007. High-throughput methylation profiling by MCA coupled to CpG island microarray. Genome Res. 17: 1529–1536.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hatada, I., Fukasawa, M., Kimura, M., Morita, S., Yamada, K., Yoshikawa, T., Yamanaka, S., Endo, C., Sakurada, A., Sato, M., et al. 2006. Genome-wide profiling of promoter methylation in human. Oncogene 25: 3059–3064.[Medline]

Heisler, L.E., Torti, D., Boutros, P.C., Watson, J., Chan, C., Winegarden, N., Takahashi, M., Yau, P., Huang, T.H., Farnham, P.J., et al. 2005. CpG Island microarray probe sequences derived from a physical library are representative of CpG Islands annotated on the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 33: 2952–2961.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rauch, T., Li, H., Wu, X., and Pfeifer, G.P. 2006. MIRA-assisted microarray analysis, a new technology for the determination of DNA methylation patterns, identifies frequent methylation of homeodomain-containing genes in lung cancer cells. Cancer Res. 66: 7939–7947.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Toyota, M., Ho, C., Ahuja, N., Jair, K.W., Li, Q., Ohe-Toyota, M., Baylin, S.B., and Issa, J.P. 1999. Identification of differentially methylated sequences in colorectal cancer by methylated CpG island amplification. Cancer Res. 59: 2307–2312.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Weber, M., Davies, J.J., Wittig, D., Oakeley, E.J., Haase, M., Lam, W.L., and Schubeler, D. 2005. Chromosome-wide and promoter-specific analyses identify sites of differential DNA methylation in normal and transformed human cells. Nat. Genet. 37: 853–862.[Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

High-throughput methylation profiling by MCA coupled to CpG island microarray
Marcos R.H. Estécio, Pearlly S. Yan, Ashraf E.K. Ibrahim, Carmen S. Tellez, Lanlan Shen, Tim H.-M. Huang, and Jean-Pierre J. Issa
Genome Res. 17: 1529-1536. [Abstract] [Full Text]