Cite as: Cold Spring Harb. Protoc.; 2009; doi:10.1101/pdb.prot5168
| Protocol |
1 Friedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, CH-4058 Basel, Switzerland
2 Cancer Biology Division, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA
3Corresponding authors (sbaylin1{at}jhmi.edu; vijay.tiwari{at}fmi.ch)
INTRODUCTION
Progress in technologies to address long-range chromosomal interactions in vivo has extensively revised concepts about different aspects of transcriptional regulation. These methods allow probing physical proximities between chromatin elements without specifically identifying the protein components that mediate such interactions. Here we describe a detailed protocol for Combined 3C-ChIP-Cloning (6C) technology, which combines multiple techniques to identify the proteins that bridge distant genomic regions, while simultaneously identifying such physical proximities. This method is also useful for determining if a candidate protein might mediate long-range interactions, both in cis and in trans in the nucleus. We discuss how the 6C technique can be incorporated with other techniques to discover all the chromatin regions in the nucleus that interact with a given gene or chromatin region of interest in a specific protein-dependent manner. Such information allows complete, cell-type-specific mapping of all the chromatin interactions mediated by specific proteins. The 6C assay advances our understanding of the three-dimensional aspects of the higher-order folding of chromatin and provides an important tool to examine the role of specific proteins in nuclear organization. In addition to providing a detailed protocol of the 6C technique, we discuss how this technology can be used by investigators working in the area of chromatin biology, with special interest in chromatin long-range interactions.
RELATED INFORMATION
The 6C assay combines three different methodologies: chromosome conformation capture (3C) (Dekker et al. 2002), chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), and cloning (Fig. 1 ). The first step involves conventional 3C methodology: The chromatin is cross-linked, digested with restriction enzymes, and ligated under conditions that favor intramolecular ligation. Immediately after ligation, the chromatin is immunoprecipitated using an antibody against the protein of interest (i.e., the suspected "bridging protein" or the protein whose mediating physical proximities the investigator wishes to map). Thereafter, the cross-links are reversed, and the DNA is purified further. The fragments obtained are then cloned into a vector harboring the same restriction enzyme site overhangs that were generated in the enzyme digestion step of the 3C portion of the protocol. The clones are further screened by digestion with the same restriction enzyme. Ideally, clones showing multiple inserts will result from the intramolecular ligation and should represent physical proximities involving the protein targeted in the immunoprecipitation steps. These clones are chosen for sequencing to reveal the identity of the partners.
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
Figure 1. Summary of the Combined 3C-ChIP-Cloning (6C) method.
|
MATERIALS
Reagents
5-Bromo-4-chloro-3-indoyl-β-D-galactopyranoside (X-gal; 25 mg/mL in DMF [dimethylformamide])
Agarose gel (1%, UltraPure; Invitrogen)
Antibody, specific for the protein of interest
Bovine serum albumin (BSA; 0.5% in PBS; New England Biolabs)
Cell type of interest, grown under appropriate cell culture conditions with appropriate medium
Cells, bacterial, competent, high-efficiency (
5 x 109 cfu/µg DNA)
XL10-Gold ultracompetent cells (Stratagene) have produced optimal results.
Cloning vector
The vector used should have enzyme overhangs similar to those generated in the 3C assay. Such vectors can be custom-constructed or obtained commercially. For example, for cloning fragments containing EcoRI ends, use pBluescript II RI Predigested Vector (Stratagene).
DNA gel stain (SYBR Safe, 10,000X concentrate in DMSO [dimethylsulfoxide]; Invitrogen)
DNA ladder, 100-bp and/or 1-kb (New England Biolabs)
DNA polymerase (REDTaq; Sigma D4309) (for polymerase chain reaction [PCR]; see Step 45 and Discussion)
dNTP set (100 mM; Invitrogen) (for PCR; see Step 45 and Discussion)
Ethanol (70% and 100%)
Fetal bovine serum (10% in PBS)
Formaldehyde solution (
36.5%; Sigma-Aldrich 33220)
Glycine (2 M; Fisher BP381)
Glycogen (Roche)
H2O, nuclease-free
Immune complex wash buffers (high-salt and low-salt)
Prepare the high-salt and low-salt versions of this buffer separately.
Isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG; 200 mg/mL)
Alternatively, LB-kanamycin agar plates can be used (see Step 48).
LB (Luria-Bertani) liquid medium
Add the appropriate antibiotic (see Step 51).
Dilute the 10X stock to 1.15X for Step 18.
Magnetic beads, Protein A-conjugated
Magnetic beads, Protein G-conjugated
PCR buffer (10X)
PCR primers, T3 and T7
Phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol, UltraPure (25:24:1 v/v/v; Invitrogen)
Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; GIBCO 20012)
Protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma P8340)
Proteinase K (10 mg/mL in TE buffer, pH 8.0; Invitrogen)
PureLink HQ 96 Mini Plasmid DNA Purification Kit (Invitrogen)
This kit is designed to yield high amounts of high-quality DNA from 96 different plasmids in the least amount of time, facilitating the simultaneous growth of several bacterial colonies and large-scale screening of the plasmids. It is particularly useful for screening several plasmids in order to obtain clones having multiple inserts.
Restriction enzyme
The selection of a restriction enzyme is a critical step for 6C methodology that affects both the 3C step and the cloning. It also determines the resolution of interaction maps that can be obtained using the 6C assay in terms of defining the exact chromatin elements that are involved in physical pairing. Enzymes that produce cohesive ends from palindromic recognition sites are preferred in 3C assays, and the six-cutters such as EcoRI, HindIII, and BglII are commonly used. These should cut every 4 kb along the genomic DNA and offer a good starting point. To obtain higher-resolution maps, frequent cutters such as MseI (predicted to cut every 256 bp) can be used. Before beginning a 6C assay, use an aliquot of the restriction enzyme-digested nuclei to test a few regions of the genome for digestion efficiency either by Southern or PCR-based analysis.
Restriction enzyme buffer (10X)
Dilute the 10X stock to 1.14X for Steps 12 and 13.
RNase A, DNase-free (10 mg/mL; Sigma R6513)
SDS (Sodium dodecyl sulfate; 20% w/v; Fisher BP166)
Sodium acetate (3 M, pH 5.2; Fisher BP333)
T4 DNA ligase (400 U/µL)
Dilute 10X stock to 1X before use.
Trypsin (1X; Invitrogen 25300)
Equipment
Aluminum foil
Cell scraper
Centrifuge, clinical
Centrifuge, high-speed, refrigerated, equipped with swinging bucket rotor for 14-mL tubes
Dishes, cell culture
DNA analysis software (Vector NTI)
DNA sequencer analysis software (Finch TV)
Gel electrophoresis tank, horizontal
Gel imaging system for quantifying PCR products
Heat block preset to 65°C
Hemocytometer
Ice
Incubator, humidified, equilibrated with 5% CO2, preset to 37°C
Liquid nitrogen (optional; see Step 11)
Magnetic stand for 1.5-mL tubes (Invitrogen)
Microcentrifuge, refrigerated
Microscope, inverted
Pasteur pipettes
Pipettors and tips, 5- to 1000-µL
Refrigerator or cold room preset to 4°C
Rotating wheel/platform
Shaking incubator preset to 37°C and 65°C
Sonicator
Spectrophotometer
Thermal cycler, automated
Timer
Tubes, microcentrifuge, 1.5-mL
Tubes, polypropylene, 14-mL (e.g., 17- x 100-mm) for use in high-speed centrifuge
Tubes, polypropylene, 50-mL
Tubes, polypropylene, conical, 15-mL (e.g., 17- x 120-mm)
Vacuum aspirator
Vortex mixer
Water bath, variable temperature
METHOD
Preparing Nuclei
Restriction Enzyme Digestion and Intramolecular Ligation
Enrichment of Ligation Fragments Containing the Protein of Interest in the Complex
Cloning of 3C-Ligated Immunoprecipitated Fragments
Plasmid Purification
Screening for Ligated Partners
TROUBLESHOOTING
Problem: The fragments are too big, and/or there are more than two inserts in the plasmids.
[Step 54]
Solution: Subclone the fragments into a new restriction enzyme-digested vector before proceeding with sequencing.
DISCUSSION
The 6C-captured interactions should be validated by performing independent 3C assays (Tolhuis et al. 2002), in which one performs 3C-PCRs using multiple primer combinations from two different remote sequences. The primers for this purpose are designed exactly as described by Splinter et al. (2004). It also is important to establish, by using separate assays, that the interacting regions captured in the 6C assay are truly occupied by the protein of interest in cells. To this end, perform ChIP assays (Tiwari et al. 2008) using antibodies specific for the protein of interest. The immunoprecipitated DNA can then be amplified using primers spanning the restriction enzyme site found to be involved in the 3C ligation with other partner(s) in each of the 6C clones.
In early attempts of the 6C assay (Tiwari et al. 2008), screening the clones by restriction digestion identified a very low frequency of clones having multiple inserts (five out of 352). A number of reasons could account for this. First, the rest of the clones that had a single insert probably represented distinct genomic sites that were bound by the specific protein (in this case, EZH2) but were not engaged in any long-range associations. Interestingly, this might also reflect the frequency with which certain protein-dependent long-range associations take place in the nucleus. Second, the number of clones with multiple inserts might also be reduced because of difficulty in cloning (i.e., ligation and transformation) or sequencing of large fragments resulting from the ligation fragments generated by a six-cutter restriction enzyme (e.g., EcoRI). Third, intramolecular ligation after cross-linking and digestion will lead to a fraction of the DNA occurring as circular DNA that cannot be cloned; this might further reduce the number of clones in such an assay. Finally, the study could also have missed some interactions involving partners that bear DNA methylation at the EcoRI site (EcoRI is a DNA methylation-sensitive enzyme). Future work should develop strategies to tackle each of these issues to improve the overall efficiency of the method.
The 6C technique can be combined with other recently published techniques to discover all the chromatin regions in the nucleus that are brought in close physical proximity to the gene (or any other chromatin region of interest) in a specific protein-dependent manner (Fig. 2 ). Following immunoprecipitation with the antibody of interest, the samples can be subjected to 4C analysis (Zhao et al. 2006) or reverse-cross-linked, purified, digested with a four-cutter enzyme of choice, and processed further for either 3C-chip (Simonis et al. 2006) or the ACT assay (Ling et al. 2006). The 6C procedure can also be used to reveal whether two known chromatin regions are brought into close physical proximity by a specific protein by following the amplification criteria used in the original 3C assay, subsequent to the reversal of cross-linking and purification (Dekker et al. 2002).
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
Figure 2. Further applications and the future of Combined 3C-ChIP-Cloning (6C) methodology.
|
Dekker, J., Rippe, K., Dekker, M., and Kleckner, N. 2002. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 295: 1306–1311.
Ling, J.Q., Li, T., Hu, J.F., Vu, T.H., Chen H.L. Qiu, X.W., Cherry, A.M., and Hoffman, A.R. 2006. CTCF mediates interchromosomal colocalization between Igf2/H19 and Wsb1/Nf1. Science 312: 269–272.
Simonis, M., Klous, P., Splinter, E., Moshkin, Y., Willemsen, R., de Wit, E., van Steensel, B., and de Laat, W. 2006. Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C). Nat. Genet. 38: 1348–1354.[Medline]
Simonis, M., Kooren, J., and de Laat, W. 2007. An evaluation of 3C-based methods to capture DNA interactions. Nat. Methods 4: 895–901.[Medline]
Splinter, E., Grosveld, F., and de Laat, W. 2004. 3C technology: Analyzing the spatial organization of genomic loci in vivo. Methods Enzymol. 375: 493–507.[Medline]
Tiwari, V.K., Cope, L., McGarvey, K.M., Ohm, J.E., and Baylin, S.B. 2008. A novel 6C assay uncovers Polycomb-mediated higher order chromatin conformations. Genome Res. 18: 1171–1179.
Tolhuis, B., Palstra, R.J., Splinter, E., Grosveld, F., and de Laat, W. 2002. Looping and interaction between hypersensitive sites in the active β-globin locus. Mol. Cell 10: 1453–1465.[Medline]
Zhao, Z., Tavoosidana, G., Sjölinder, M., Göndör, A., Mariano, P., Wang, S., Kanduri, C., Lezcano, M., Sandhu, K.S., Singh, U., et al. 2006. Circular chromosome conformation capture (4C) uncovers extensive networks of epigenetically regulated intra- and interchromosomal interactions. Nat. Genet. 38: 1341–1347.[Medline]
Copyright © 2009 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Online ISSN: 1559-6095 Terms of Service |