Table

Table 1. Final yields of unlabeled and triple-labeled proteins from 50-mL cell cultures: Comparison between high-cell-density and traditional IPTG methods

Yield (mg) Molecular weight (Daltons)
Protein High cell densityb IPTGb Calculated Measured %Dc
Triple-labeled
RAP (1-210) 20 ± 3 0.5 33,801 33525 ± 195 ~92
RAP (91-323) 25 ± 3 0.8 36,633 36,376 ± 200 ~93
ApoE (1-183)a 18 ± 4 2 22,866 22,686 ± 116 ~89
Mouse apoAI (1-216) 15 ± 2 0.8 28,014 27,732 ± 125 ~90
Human apoAI 14 ± 1 0.6 32,814 32,401 ± 150 ~88
Unlabeled
Human apoAI 34 ± 1 1.0
Human apoE 17 ± 2 0.2
aApoE (1-183) was expressed in 40% D2O; the other proteins were expressed in 99.7% D2O.
bHigh cell density: high-cell-density expression methods, including auto-induction and high-cell-density IPTG induction; IPTG: IPTG-induced expression. Auto-induction expression was repeated at least three times for each protein; the yield shown is the average ± standard deviation.
cEstimated percentage of deuteration, assuming 100% 13C and 15N-labeling. For apoE (1-183), the %D is based on 40% D2O. For all other proteins, the D% is based on 99.7% D2O.
No Related Web Pages
| Table of Contents

This Article

  1. doi:10.1101/pdb.tab195475 Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2010: pdb.tab195475-

Article Category

  1. Table

Personal Folder

  1. Save to Personal Folders

Updates/Comments

  1. Alert me when Updates/Comments are published

Share