Topic Introduction

Mosquito Electroantennography

  1. Chloé Lahondère1,2,3,4,5,6
  1. 1Department of Biochemistry,
  2. 2The Fralin Life Science Institute,
  3. 3The Global Change Center,
  4. 4Department of Entomology,
  5. 5Center of Emerging, Zoonotic and Arthropod-borne Pathogens, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA
  1. 6Correspondence: lahonder{at}vt.edu

Abstract

Mosquitoes use multiple cues to locate food sources (animal and plants), mates, and oviposition sites. The sense of smell plays an important role in these behaviors, and olfactory cues are detected primarily by the appendages on the head—in particular, the antennae. Thus, mosquito olfaction can be studied by conducting electroantennogram (EAG) recordings. EAGs have emerged as a reliable technique to screen for bioactive compounds and are useful in the development of attractants and repellents for mosquito population control. Here, we focus on comparing the two main experimental approaches used in the literature (whole-body and whole-head mounting) and highlight key considerations for conducting EAGs in multiple species and for obtaining reliable and reproducible data.

Footnotes

  • From the Mosquitoes collection, edited by Laura B. Duvall and Benjamin J. Matthews.

| Table of Contents

This Article

  1. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 2022: pdb.top107679- © 2022 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
  1. All Versions of this Article:
    1. pdb.top107679v1
    2. 2022/9/pdb.top107679 most recent

Article Category

  1. Topic Introduction

Personal Folder

  1. Save to Personal Folders

Updates/Comments

  1. Alert me when Updates/Comments are published

Share