| Response: |
|
| Truncate/modify bait |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
− |
− |
It may be necessary to subdivide bait into two or three overlapping constructs, each of which must be tested independently. |
| Use more stringent strain/reporter combination |
+ |
+ |
− |
− |
+? |
+? |
Use of very stringent interaction strains may eliminate detection of biologically relevant interactions. |
| Fuse to nuclear localization sequence pJK202 |
− |
− |
+ |
− |
− |
− |
|
| Put LexA-fused protein under GAL1-inducible promoter pGilda |
+? |
− |
− |
+ |
+? |
+? |
Can no longer use GAL-dependence of reporter phenotype to indicate cDNA-dependent interaction |
| Fuse LexA to the carboxyl terminus of the bait pNLexA |
− |
− |
− |
− |
+ |
− |
Generally, LexA poorly tolerates attachment of the amino-terminal fusion domain; only ~60% of constructs are expressed correctly. |
| Integrate bait, reduce concentration pEG202I |
+? |
− |
− |
+? |
+? |
+ |
Reduced bait protein concentration may lead to reduced assay sensitivity. |
|
| (+) Would usually help; (+?) may help; (−) will not help. |
| aAll of the alternative bait expression vectors remain on an AmpR selection for bacteria. If using them as is, the investigator may need to use a KC8 bacterial passage to isolate the library
plasmid after a library screen.
|